So first let me say that while I sincerely believe that to practice tai chi in all its depth, we must learn the martial aspects of it (this not only contributes to our ability to fight and defend ourselves, but is necessary to perform the movements correctly and with the proper intent in order to get the health and wellness benefits), I have never fought using tai chi. I have practiced push hands and done some minor sparring, but have not had to use it in a fight. I would think most practitioners of tai chi, no matter how martially they present themselves, in this day and age, have not had to fight. So, really, the practice, from a martial context, is for sport. Even the toughest MMa guys might have to admit that what they do is sport. And this is not to put down MMa or sport, it’s just a reality.
Having said that, I would like to comment on the concept od combat tai chi, and what, from a theoretical viewpoint, it should look like. So my second admission is that I practice wu and yang style tai chi, and have encorporated chan su chin silk reeling exercises from the chen style into my prqactice, but I have never learned chen style, so my comment on chen style is from an outside view. It seems to me that the focus of “fa JIn” in chen style, issuing power, is too much. There is a whole lot of shaking and expulsion and whipping of power, like a dog shaking water off its fur(again not a negative comment), almost to the point that it seems to me that it can be exhausting and even close to causing whiplash. So, a chen stylist would say that it adheres to tai chi principles and is necessary to be effective in the end. I don’t know. It is not the way I practice tai chi and it would not be the way I would try to finish a fight or get out of a hold or parry a blow etc.
My second comment goes to other practitioners who demonstrate combat tai chi in videos. While it is impressive and well trained and looks really cool, it appears explosive and very external, very chop chop rhythmically, and ends with a flourishing tai chi posture after the fact.
Perhaps becaus I have a deep love(again I have not practiced aikido) for aikido, I like to embue my tai chi with an aikido quality–smooth, circular, flowing, effortless. Again, theoretically, the tai chi techniques and movements lend themselves to an aikido-esque practice.
In the end, I would say, combat tai chi should follow the thirteen principles–peng lu ji an, ward off, rollback, press push, then grab pull down, split rend, elbow, bump. Those are eight, the remaining five being, step forward, step back, left, right, standing still.
Trying to make a technique work through muscle and power is not tai chi. Understanding the interraction of yin and yang and encorporating the 13 principles is tai chi. And it is what I believe would make tai chi highly effective in combat. Yes, to win a fight, you will have to make an opponent topple to the floor or go crashing through a plate glass window, or throw an effective punch or open palm strike, or kick someone. I’ve worked to encorporate some western boxing techniques in my overall arsenal of practice–the jab, the left hook, the right cross, the uppercut. Tai chi and taoism are open to all techniques, they all can become tai chi.
The chen whip is really cool. external kung fu is really cool. western boxing and MMA brazilian jujitsu is really cool. But tai chi and aikido are also really cool. So focus and reflect on whether what you are doing is truly tai chi.
Recent Comments